Research · Manufacturers
CheckMARC measures curing-light output to laboratory standard
In a study published in Dental Materials, CheckMARC measurements landed typically within 2% of an integrating sphere, the gold-standard benchtop instrument, across eight brands of LED curing light.
When a measurement is going to inform a clinical decision, or appear in a manufacturer's specification, it has to be trustworthy. For curing-light output, the benchmark of trust is the integrating sphere, the benchtop instrument that researchers treat as the gold standard for characterizing how much light a unit actually delivers.
In a study published in Dental Materials, among the leading journals in dental restoratives research, CheckMARC was evaluated against the other available methods for measuring curing-light output. The finding was direct: CheckMARC delivered laboratory-grade accuracy across eight brands of LED curing light.
CheckMARC measurements were typically within 2% of those from an integrating sphere, the instrument the field treats as the gold standard.
Within 2% of the gold standard
Specifically, the authors reported that CheckMARC measurements “were typically within 2%” of those taken with an integrating sphere. That is a tight margin against a benchtop reference instrument, close enough that a spectrometer-based device small enough to live on a clinic counter behaves like laboratory equipment.
The authors went further. They noted that spectrometer-based devices like CheckMARC overcome many of the limitations in the current ISO standard for this measurement, and that CheckMARC's sensor surface made it “the more accurate device” when set against traditional laboratory equipment such as thermopiles and integrating spheres.
Typical agreement between CheckMARC and a benchtop integrating sphere across eight brands of LED curing light, per a study in Dental Materials.
Why it matters beyond the bench
Validation at this level is what separates a meter you guess with from an instrument you can publish from. It is the same measurement engine that powers in-clinic curing-light evaluations and the research performed on MARC-LC, so a number captured chairside carries the same confidence as one captured in a lab.
For manufacturers, that means radiant-exitance claims can rest on a method that compares favourably to the gold standard. For clinicians and researchers, it means the data behind a passed or failed light is defensible. If you are validating curing-light performance or specifying output, that is the work we do: CheckMARC for in-clinic evaluation and measurement for manufacturers start from the same lab-grade foundation.
References
- Shortall, A. C., Felix, C. M., Watts, D. C. "Robust spectrometer-based methods for characterizing radiant exitance of dental LED light curing units." Dental Materials 31.4 (2015): 339–350. PMID: 25773187.
- ISO 10650-2:2007, Dentistry, Powered polymerization activators, Part 2: Light-emitting diode (LED) lamps. International Organization for Standardization.
Read the study on PubMed.